Chris CrockettSnapping Pics Of Your Trouser Trout All The Rage Among Athletes Lately
January 29th 2010 14:19
Can somebody make me understand something? Really. I want somebody to make me understand what this whole 'I need to snap a pic of my EFFIN trouser trout and send it to my lady' phase is when it comes to athletes lately. Anyone want to take a shot at explaining the brain power levels of these mental midgets who are doing this?
I remember a year or two ago, Washington Redskins tight end, Chris Cooley, was blogging in the nude (very odd in itself; I've never done that but I have blogged in my bathrobe) when he took a picture of the laptop screen and a piece of his schlong was caught in the pic near the keyboard of the computer.
Then we had Grady Sizemore dropping his one eyed snake into a coffee mug amongst other poses while in front of a mirror snapping pics to send to his girlfriend via e-mail. Great move Grady.
Now we have Long Dong Oden. Greg Oden in a very similar pose, in front of a mirror, snapping away at his johnson before the inevitable e-mail to the lady friend. Lady friend gets e-mail. Lady friend eventually falls out of love with Long Dong Oden and decides to post pics of his member on the internet. Great move Greg. I don't care if your dong is big enough to be considered its own continent, I still don't get it.
How bout this.....Instead of snapping pics of your penises, why not just head out and find your next piece of ass down the club or wherever you guys go? I mean, who are these pics being sent to anyway; the loves of your lives or just various pieces of road beef that you come into contact with? I'm leaning toward the road beef side of the equation, boys. So why waste valuable time snapping pics? There's always more road beef! Just head out and go get you some more! Pics are a waste of time IMO. You boys have a lot of ground to make up if you want to catch Uncle Wilt and his 20,000 women! Eye on the prize gentlemen. Eye on the goddamn prize.
Chuck
~TCFB~
| 19 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by 5280
As an example, you can't see the entire moon if you are actually standing on it (see diagram). To gain a viewpoint of its entirety, one has to move back a considerable distance.
For the sake of simplicity let's round off the Moon's diameter to 2,000 miles (it is actually 2,159 miles). As you can see even at a distance of 2,000 miles, the full diameter can not be fully seen. Then of course as you move closer, you are able to see less and less of the moon's entirety, although you can see greater detail of its veiny rippled surface.
For a less grand explanation, go to the Museum and try using your cell phone camera to try to snap a picture of a blue whale while standing right next to it. Sure you can see every ridge and contour in detail but the full scope of the mighty beast is lost.